It?s a long film with its multiple story lines, but I deride anyone who thinks that?s a bad thing just because, as though simplicity is a must for any comic book film. But it might have well benefited from the complete omission of Sandman, or at least a drastic rethink of how it ends up as the resolution of that character is a farce. The theme of revenge ? Sandman?s seeming reason for inclusion - could have been addressed elsewhere.
Sandman says: "I'm not a bad man, I've just had bad luck". Well, TV movie of week, here we come. If I wanted a miss-understood small time crook with a heart of gold that "never wanted this", then I would _not_ be watching a super hero film, from which, I expect to see a super _villain_. His effects work is brilliant, and his story arc with his daughter/Spidey makes sense on paper - for a TV movie. Because of that you just can't help but feel cheated. Give the creature a real reason to hate Spiderman, and Spidey a real reason to hate the Sandman - one which the Sandman can't talk himself out of, such as with a little heart-to-heart chat beginning with the repugnant "I never wanted this...".
It was the Brock/Venom storyline which provided the meat of antagonism in
Spidey 3 and cause for excitement. A pleasing turn from Topher Grace could have
been beefed up quite considerably; a closer look at Venom and far more
utilisation of his powers in battle with Spidey. Not quite sure if Spidey 3 was
striving for that epic feel, couldn?t help but think of the Stay-Puft
Marshmallow Man when that end battle sequence arrived, plus a severe case of
damsel-in-distress d?j? vu almost annoys. Despite some plot deficiencies,
(Bernard and Harry) the three-way story between Peter, Mary-Jane and Harry ends
in a pleasing way, as does the current three-film arc.
out of ten
Reviewed by Paul Boschen